The key reason why Can be Modern dating is harder for guys — Specifically Intended for Focused
But the real obscene of his work are those faces undone by unequal well-being, by grabbing wealth. And women, poor whores or mistresses, with those swollen bodies from the present, bruised from having too much, or too little, perfectly express the spirit of the times. In short, satire. Unpleasant, too, and therefore good.
Not that it was better in other places and in other eras. It is true that fascism tolerated some
laugh, careful that humor did not overflow in the criticism. It is also true that many of the best post-war talents matured in mildly tolerated satirical newspapers (Zavattini, Scola, Fellini, Marcello Marchesi at Marc’Aurelio, to say). And the immense Petrolini, who was awarded a few medals by the regime, even managed to take them for a ride during the ceremony, shouting: “I don’t care!”. Great.
But when the going got tough, nothing to do, censorship and confinement. So for Giuseppe Scalarini, who in fact invented the Italian political cartoon, it was a continuum of sentences and punitive stays. And Il Becco Giallo, which made people laugh a lot, was closed without much ceremony. Among other things, he dared to mock Luigi Pirandello’s fervent fascism by calling him P. Randello. Chapeau.
Not for this the Italians stopped laughing at their (actually ridiculous) capataz: the jokes about the Duce have been a kind of literary genre for years. Punished and repressed by the watchful regime, which therefore made people laugh even more and generated more jokes, such as the historical one of Mussolini’s driver running over a pig with his car.
“Go and tell the farm – says the Duce, always attentive to the people – say you are my driver”.
When he comes back loaded with gifts, the Duce makes a surprised face and the soldier explains:
“I said: I am the driver of the Duce and I killed the pig. And they made me party and covered me with gifts ”.
To ban satire, then everyone tried. In the post-war Soviet dullness, even after Stalin, laughter about the regime was a classic, and there was also a lot of risk, as the joke of the two judges talking to each other says:
Russian refinements, while in East Germany people went more down to earth and the story of Honecker who orders to build a walkway over the lake to show his people that they know how to walk on water makes you laugh. The Germans watch the scene and comment:
Now, let’s face it: it is no longer the adolescent and belligerent times in which it was believed that “a laugh will bury you”, but it is undeniable that laughter against power remains a subversive gesture. Even when power itself does it: because it will be true that Merkel and Sarkozy’s open sneer in the face of Silvio buanima (October 2011, memorable) was not satire, but there is no doubt that they buried him.
But be that as it may, what comes from below, from the sore belly of ordinary people, citizens transformed into subjects, is a bitter and arrogant laugh, always on the border between satire and insult, between sarcasm and irony, and of “good taste” and “politically correct” loves to give a damn.
Of course you can forbid satire with the bad or the good (flattering it, removing the detonator of courage, or vulgarity, or bad taste, or unpleasantness, in short, teaching it, making it digestible), but we will never get rid of it. really. Not even in the most serious cases, as the old Russian story of the two dissident friends goes:
“Look, I have a bad feeling. Let’s do this, if they deport me to Siberia I will write to you. If I write with black ink it’s all true, if I write with red ink it means that they control me and you don’t have to believe what I say, ok? “
“Dear Boris, I am finally writing to you from my new home. Everything is beautiful here, the food is good, the girls are kind, a true paradise.